Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, CHIEF JUSTICEANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Outcome
Withdrawn
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 77.Mahasin Mallick.. RespondentsPrayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to remove the lock and seal in the secured asset being Door No.175 and 181 Idayar Street in Old TS No.6/278…
Judgment
W.P.No.32977 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQW.P.No.32977 of 2024M/S.Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.,rep. by its Authorised Officer, P.Ramalingam, Centennial Square, 5th Floor,6A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Kodambakkam, Chenai-600 024... Petitioner vs1. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.
The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.
The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Sivanandha Colony, Tatabad, Coimbatore.
The Executive Engineer, TNED, Tatabad, Coimbatore.__________Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32977 of 2024 5. The Town Planning Officer (Central Zone), Office of Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.
The Assistant Town Planning Officer (Central Zone), Office of Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.
Operative part
Mahasin Mallick.. RespondentsPrayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to remove the lock and seal in the secured asset being Door No.175 and 181 Idayar Street in Old TS No.6/278, New TS.No.295/1 and 2, Coimbatore Taluk and Town, Coimbatore based on the representation dated 30.09.2024 given to the first respondent so as to enable us to proceed against the said property under SARFAESI Act and Rules in order to recover the loan granted to the seventh respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.R.SreedharFor Respondents: Mr.D.FerdinandStanding Counselfor respondent Nos.1 and 2:Mr.M.Santhanaramanfor respondent No.7:No appearance for respondent Nos.3, 5 & 6:R4 – Not Ready in Notice__________Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32977 of 2024 ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.) 04.02.2025 Index : Yes/NoNC:Yes/Nosasi__________Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32977 of 2024 To:1. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.2.The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.3.The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Sivanandha Colony, Tatabad, Coimbatore. 4. The Executive Engineer, TNED, Tatabad, Coimbatore. 5. The Town Planning Officer (Central Zone), Office of Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.6.The Assistant Town Planning Officer (Central Zone), Office of Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore-641 018.__________Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32977 of 2024 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ ,J. (sasi) W.P.No.32977 of 2024 04.02.2025__________Page 5 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.