No. 18280 of 2025and W.M.P. Nos. 20475 & 20477 of 2025 N.Palanisamy v. The District Collector Salem District, Salem.2. District Revenue Officer Salem District, Salem.3
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P. No. 18280 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.07.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No. 18280 of 2025and W.M.P. Nos. 20475 & 20477 of 2025N.Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs.
The District Collector Salem District, Salem.
District Revenue Officer Salem District, Salem.
The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Office Sooramangalam, Salem-5.
The Tahsildar Salem West Taluk Salem.5 The Sub-Registrar Suramangalam SRO Salem District, Salem._________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 18280 of 20256. V.Santhi7. Indhirani... RespondentsPrayer : This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records made in impugned order in Na.Ka.No.2644/2023/A3 dated 07.06.2024 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer /third respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and direct the second respondent to cancel the patta issued in favour of the sixth and seventh respondents herein to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner: Mr.K.KalaikovanFor Respondents: Mr.P.Sathish, AGP (R1 to R5)
Operative part
O R D E RToday when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No Costs._________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 18280 of 20253. Registry is directed to return the impugned order filed by the petitioner to the counsel for the petitioner under written acknowledgement after substituting the same with certified copy thereof, to be obtained and produced by the counsel for the petitioner.04.07.2025Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking /Non-speaking orderMayaTo1. The District Collector Salem District, Salem.2. District Revenue Officer Salem District, Salem.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Office Sooramangalam, Salem-5.4. The Tahsildar Salem West Taluk Salem.5 The Sub-Registrar Suramangalam SRO Salem District, Salem._________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 18280 of 2025MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.MayaW.P. No. 18280 of 2025 Dated : 04.07.2025_________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.