Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the factsPage No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R. SAKTHIVEL, J.kmmand circumstance of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.12.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVELC.R.P.No.1781 of 2022andC.M.P.No. 8964 of 2022 M.Velumani, Nos.40 & 41, Raja Street, Kallimadai, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005. ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Judgment Debtor/RespondentVs.
Araiyammal2. Saraswathi3. Manickam4. Soundararaj(The Respondents 1 to 4 residing atNo.13A, New No.10, Anaiyankadu, 1st Street),Kallimadai, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005).5. Indirani, No.22, R.V.L. West Colony, Masoodi Street, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005. Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Thangavelu, No.13A, New No.10,Anaiyankadu, 1st Street, Kallimalai, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005. … Respondents/Respondents/Decree Holder/PetitionersPRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the fair and final order passed in E.A.No.100 of 2011 in E.P.No.103 of 2009 in R.C.O.P.No.101 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Coimbatore, dated December 15, 2017.For Petitioner: Mr.R.Arunmozhi Devan, for Mr.C.Santhosh Kumar. For Respondents :Mr.Sheik Mohamed Yaser, For Mr.M.Rajasekar.
O R D E RMr. R.Arunmozhi Devan, representing Mr.Sheik Mohamed Yaser, learned Counsel on Record for the Revision Petitioner, Mr. Sheik Mohamed Yaser, representing Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned Counsel for the Respondents are before this Court.2. Learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case file. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
The scanned version of the endorsement is reproduced below:
Operative part
In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the factsPage No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R. SAKTHIVEL, J.kmmand circumstance of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 16.12.2025Index : Yes / No Speaking Order: Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / NokmmToThe Principal District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.C.R.P.No.1781 of 2022andC.M.P.No.8964 of 2022 Page No.4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.