Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R SAKTHIVEL
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.10-04-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoMSM4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 1998R. SAKTHIVEL, J.,MSMCMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 199810.04.20265/5
Judgment
CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 1998IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVELCMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 1998----N.M.MadheswaranS/o.Muthusamy Gounder11/7, Pattinathar StreetP.Mettupalayam, P.O.-638 315,Sakthi Nagar Via, Erode District....Petitioner/AppellantVersusGangayammal (Died)W/o.Late. Muthusamy GounderS.M.Mani (Died)S/o.Late. Muthusamy Gounder1.N.M.MahendranS/o.Late. Muthusamy GounderNathakadu VeethiPerunthalaiur PostSakthi Nagar ViaGopi Tk – 638315.
M.SarojiniW/o.Late. Muthusamy GounderNehru VeethiP.Mettupalayam PostSakthi Nagar Via.,Gopi TK-638315.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 19983.M.RajeswariW/o.Late. Muthusamy GounderThiruvalluvar StreetP.Mettupalayam PostSakthi Nagar Via., Gopi TK-638 315.4.R.JayammalW/o.RajendranNethaji VeethiP.Mettupalayam (PO)Sakthi Nagar Via.,Gopi Taluk-638 315. ...Respondents 1 to 4/Respondents 1 to 45.M.ChandraW/o.ManiS/o.Late.N.M.ManiNo.29, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa VeethiMettupalayamGobichettipalayamSenthilkumar (Died)S/o.Late.N.M.Mani6.SivakarthiS/o.Late.N.M.ManiNo.29, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa VeethiMettupalayamGobichettipalayam. ...Respondents 5 & 6Proposed Respondents 5 & 6Deceased LRs of Late. Mani7.MageshwariW/o.Late. SenthilkumarNo.29, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa VeethiMettupalayamGobichettipalayam2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 19988.Sithirai balaD/o.Late. SenthilkumarNo.29, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa VeethiMettupalayamGobichettipalayam. 9. DharsanD/o.Late. SenthilkumarNo.29, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa VeethiMettupalayamGobichettipalayam ...Respondents 7 to 9/Proposed Respondents 7 to 9Deceased LRs of Late. Senthilkumar Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963, praying to condone the delay of 430 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused by the deceaesd of the proposed respondent, namely, Late. Senthilkumar in the Second Appeal. For Petitioner: Ms.Shalinifor Mr.A.SivajiFor RR5 to 7:Mr.Adhithiya, Government Advocatefor Mr.K.SelvarajORDERMs.Shalini, representing Mr.A.Sivaji, Counsel on record for the Petitioner and Mr.Adhithiya, representing Mr.K.Selvaraj, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 are before the Court.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 19982.This Court has perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition.
Reason stated in the affidavit is satisfied. Hence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.
Operative part
Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.10-04-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoMSM4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 1998R. SAKTHIVEL, J.,MSMCMP.No. 18152 of 2023inS.A.No. 1464 of 199810.04.20265/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.