✦ Madras High Court

N.Aarthi v. E.Rajkumar

V LAKSHMINARAYANAN T

Case at a glance

Bench
V LAKSHMINARAYANAN T

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Tr.CMP.No.915 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07.06.2024CoramTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Tr.CMP No.915 of 2023andCMP.No.21844 of 2023N.Aarthi... Petitioner-Versus-E.Rajkumar... RespondentTransfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C. seeking to withdraw IDOP.No.57 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur and to transfer the same to the file of the IV Additional Family Court Judge at Chennai. For Petitioner: Mr.U.AnunithaORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent in unison would submit that the respondent/husband is going to withdraw IDOP.No.57 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruvallur. 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.No.915 of 20232. Since the main petition itself is being withdrawn, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this petition.3. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.07.06.2024 nlIndex: yes / noNeutral Citation: yes / noSpeaking / Non Speaking Order2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.No.915 of 2023To1.The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur2.The IV Additional Family Court Judge at Chennai.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.No.915 of 2023V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.nlTr.CMP.No.915 of 2023 07.06.2024 4 of 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments