✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

G JAYACHANDRAN, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
G JAYACHANDRAN, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the petition is allowed[Dr

Judgment

Operative part

C.M.P.No.26058 of 2025inC.M.A.SR.No.25813 of 2024Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.andMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.[Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.]The petition has been filed with a delay of 501 days in paying the deficit Court fee.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 501 days in paying the deficit court fee is hereby condoned. Accordingly, the petition is allowed[Dr.G.J., J.] & [M.S.K., J.] 05.11.2025 rplNote: The Registry is directed to number the CMA, if it is otherwise, in order.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments