Judgment · High Court · 2022
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Jun 2022
- Bench
- P VELMURUGAN, K GOVINDARAJAN
Outcome
Allowed
Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 22.Sabari Inn Hotels Ltd.,Rep. By Its Director, Mr.M.Manikandan, S/O.Murugesan, No.29, Thirumalai Pillai Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.,Now At Old No.28, New No.30, 6th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028.,Now Represented By Its Director Mr.Venkatraman Kannan...Respondent(s)OSA(CAD) No. 127 of 2022M/s.Sree Gokulam Hotels(India) Pvt. Ltd.,Rep.by its…
Judgment
CMP No. 16130 of 2026__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADICMP No. 16130 of 2026 INOSA(CAD) NO. 127 OF 2022 ANDCMP No. 19990 of 2022 AND CMP No. 13839 of 2022 Sree Gokulam Hotels(India) Pvt. Ltd.,Rep.by its Director Mr.V.C.Praveen, Having its registered office at No.49, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024...Appellant(s)Vs1.SPN Hotels PVT Ltd.,Rep By Managing Director, Mr. SPN Krishnamoorthy, Having Office At No.152, Greenways Road, Chennai 28.
Operative part
Sabari Inn Hotels Ltd.,Rep. By Its Director, Mr.M.Manikandan, S/O.Murugesan, No.29, Thirumalai Pillai Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.,Now At Old No.28, New No.30, 6th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028.,Now Represented By Its Director Mr.Venkatraman Kannan...Respondent(s)OSA(CAD) No. 127 of 2022M/s.Sree Gokulam Hotels(India) Pvt. Ltd.,Rep.by its Director Mr.V.C.Praveen, Having its registered office at No.49, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. Appellant(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16130 of 2026__________Page2 of 4Vs1.SPN Hotels PVT Ltd.,Rep by Managing Director, Mr. SPN Krishnamoorthy, having office at No.152, Greenways Road, Chennai 28.2.M/s. Sabari Inn Hotels Ltd.,Rep.by its Director, Mr.M.Manikandan, S/o.Murugesan, No.29, Thirumalai Pillai Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017., Now at Old No.28, New No.30, 6th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028., Now represented by its Director Mr.Venkatraman Kannan. Respondent(s)CMP No. 16130 of 2026To permit the petitioner/appellant to amend the cause title of the above OSA(CAD) No.127 of 2022 on the file of the Honble Court, OSA(CAD) No. 127 of 2022To set aside the Judgement and decree passed by the Single Judge in Application No.4393 of 2021 in CS (Comm) No.642 of 2019 dated 29.06.2022 and direct the suit CS (Comm) No.642 of 2019to be heard on merits after recording oral and documentary evidence.CMP No. 16130 of 2026 For Petitioner(s):Ms.R.RamyaFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.Balachandran for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16130 of 2026__________Page3 of 4ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.)This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to permit the petitioner/appellant to amend the cause title in OSA(CAD) No.127 of 2022 on the file of this Court.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.
The petitioner/appellant is directed to file the amended copy of memorandum of grounds of appeal and registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment and list the main appeal after two weeks. (P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 31-07-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoKSA-2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16130 of 2026__________Page4 of 4P.VELMURUGAN, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.KSA-2CMP No. 16130 of 2026INOSA(CAD) NO. 127 OF 202231-07-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 29 Jun 2022. The bench was P VELMURUGAN, K GOVINDARAJAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.