✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

R HEMALATHA

Case at a glance

Bench
R HEMALATHA

Outcome

Allowed

Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 778 days in filing the above appeal is condoned

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 778 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

Judgment

C.M.P.No.18263 of 2024 inC.M.A.SR.No.99111 of 2024C.M.P.No.18263 of 2024 inC.M.A.SR.No.99111 of 2024R.HEMALATHA,J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 778 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2.

Since the 1st respondent remained absent before the Tribunal and was set exparte, issuance of notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with.

3.

Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent did not raise any serious objection in allowing this petition.

Operative part

4.

Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 778 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

5.

Registry is directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of Mr.J.Chandran, counsel for the 2nd Respondent in the main C.M.A. and post the same for admission in due course.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.18263 of 2024 inC.M.A.SR.No.99111 of 2024R.HEMALATHA,J.vum6. It is made clear that for the period of delay of 778 days, the petitioners / appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 09.09.2024vumC.M.P.No.18263 of 2024 inC.M.A.SR.No.99111 of 2024(3/3)2/2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments