Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R HEMALATHA
Outcome
Allowed
Hence, the petition is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Mr.A.Muthukumar, learned counsel appearing for Respondents 1, 3 and 4 did not raise any serious objection and this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
Judgment
C.M.P.No.8757 of 2022in S.A.No.552 of 2018C.M.P.No.8757 of 2022in S.A.No.552 of 2018R. HEMALATHA, J. This petition is filed to bring on record the legal heir of the deceased second respondent and rank her as fifth respondent in the above appeal.
Operative part
Mr.A.Muthukumar, learned counsel appearing for Respondents 1, 3 and 4 did not raise any serious objection and this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.552 of 2018 and list the matter for final hearing after two weeks. 17.02.2025vumR. HEMALATHA, J.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.8757 of 2022in S.A.No.552 of 2018vumC.M.P.No.8757 of 2022in S.A.No.552 of 201817.02.2025(1/2)2/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.