✦ Madras High Court

C.Bagyalakshmi2/5 30th Mgr Street Gkm Colony v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.30-06-2025KSTNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The State Of TamilnaduRep By Secretary Commercial Tax And Registration Department, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 23496 of 20252.The Princpal Financial…

Judgment

W.P No. 23496 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHWP No. 23496 of 2025 ANDWMP Nos. 26374 & 26376 OF 2025C.Bagyalakshmi2/5 30th Mgr Street Gkm Colony, Chennai 600 082.... PetitionerVs1. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Secretary Commercial Tax And Registration Department, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.

2.

The Princpal Financial Advisor Integral Coach Factory, Chennai 600 038.

3.

The Assistant Financial Advisor Integral Coach Factory, Chennai 600 038.

4.

Shriram Chits India P Ltd 149 Greams Dugar Building, 4th Floor Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.... RespondentsPRAYER1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 23496 of 2025 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the Statutory Appeal filed by the petitioner in Appeal No. 10027958/G/2025 dated 04.04.2025 within a time stipulated by this honourable Court. For Petitioner :Mr.D.G. HariprasathFor Respondents: Mr.E.Veda Bagath SinghSpecial Government Pleader-for R1Mr.L.J.VengateshCentral Government Standing Counsel - for RR 2 and 3ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner under the Chit Funds Act against the order passed by the Arbitrator in ARC No.615 of 2012 dated 28.12.2020.2. Heard Mr.D.G.Hariprasath, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader for the first respondent and Mr.L.J.Vengatesh, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents 2 and 3.3. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that as against the order passed by the Arbitrator in ARC No.615 of 2012 dated 28.01.2020, the petitioner 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 23496 of 2025has preferred a statutory appeal filed before the first respondent and the same is pending. In the meantime, steps were taken to attach the property of the petitioner and aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed.4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act 1982 is pending before the first respondent, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to deal with the appeal and pass final orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, the execution of the order passed by the Arbitrator in ARC 615 of 2012 shall be kept in abeyance.

Operative part

5.

This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.30-06-2025KSTNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The State Of TamilnaduRep By Secretary Commercial Tax And Registration Department, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 23496 of 20252.The Princpal Financial AdvisorIntegral Coach Factory, Chennai 600 038.3.The Assistant Financial AdvisorIntegral Coach Factory, Chennai 600 038.4.Shriram Chits India P Ltd149 Greams Dugar Building, 4th Floor Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No. 23496 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.KSTWP No. 23496 of 202530-06-20255/5

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Chit Funds Act; Chit Funds Act, 1982 — s. 70.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments