Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
21450/2019(2)In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The District Educational Officer Vellore District, Vellore. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the 1st respondent against…
Judgment
WP.No.21450/2019IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.03.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARWP.No.21450/2019 & WMP.No.20653/2019Shanthi Niketan Matriculation Hr.SecSchool [A Unit of Annamalai MudaliarEducational Trust] rep.by its CorrespondentMrs.T.Shanthi... PetitionerVs.
The Special Officer Private Schools Fee Determination Committee DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.
The Deputy Secretary to Government Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Schools Fee Committee, School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
The Director Directorate of Matriculation Schools DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
The Chief Educational Officer1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.21450/2019 Vellore District, Vellore.
Operative part
The District Educational Officer Vellore District, Vellore. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the 1st respondent against the petitioner school and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to drop all further proceedings. For Petitioner: Mr.Baskar.DFor R1: Mr.S.Silambanan, Senior counsel forMr.M.Babu BarveezFor RR2 to 5: Mrs.S.Mytherye ChandruSpl.GP [Edn]ORDER[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,](1)The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the prayer in the writ petition does not survive and no further order is required and hence, prayed that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement in the writ petition to that effect.2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.21450/2019(2)In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.] 08.03.2024APInternet : YesTo1.The Special Officer Private Schools Fee Determination Committee DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.2.The Deputy Secretary to Government Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Schools Fee Committee, School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.3.The Director Directorate of Matriculation Schools DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.4.The Chief Educational Officer Vellore District, Vellore. 5. The District Educational Officer Vellore District, Vellore.3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.21450/2019S.S. SUNDAR, J., andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.,APWP.No.21450/201908.03.20244
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 21450/2019(2)In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.