✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

S M SUBRAMANIAM, N SENTHILKUMAR

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33.The District Educational Officer (Secondary)ThiruvannamalaiThiruvannamalai District – 606 604.... Appellantsvs.1.S.B.Hena Gomathi PriyankaD/o.Bavani Kumar2.The CorrespondentALC Higher Secondary SchoolSaron, Thiruvannamalai District – 606 601.… RespondentsWrit Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 12.02.2024 made in W.P.No.2963 of 2024…

Judgment

W.A.No.1607 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARW.A.No.1607 of 2026andC.M.P.No.14824 of 20261.The Director of School EducationDPI Campus, College RoadChennai-600 006.

2.

The Chief Educational OfficerThiruvannamalaiThiruvannamalai District – 606 601.

3.

The District Educational Officer (Secondary)ThiruvannamalaiThiruvannamalai District – 606 604.... Appellantsvs.1.S.B.Hena Gomathi PriyankaD/o.Bavani Kumar2.The CorrespondentALC Higher Secondary SchoolSaron, Thiruvannamalai District – 606 601.… RespondentsWrit Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 12.02.2024 made in W.P.No.2963 of 2024 and allow the above writ appeal. Page Nos.1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1607 of 2026 For Appellants: Dr.R.GouriGovernment CounselFor Respondents: Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan, for R1*****J U D G M E N T[Made by S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.,]Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the approval of appointment has already been granted to the respondent, subject to the final outcome of the Special Leave Petition which is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Thus, no further adjudication is required. 2. In view of the above submission, the Writ Appeal stands closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 22.06.2026Index : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking ordermkPage Nos.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1607 of 2026S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.,andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.,mkW.A.No.1607 of 202622.06.2026Page Nos.3/3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments