Naveen Prasanth v. The State
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.M.P.No.11194 of 2025in Crl.O.P.No.9605 of 2025 Naveen Prasanth... PetitionerVs.The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kondalampatti Police Station, Salem City.... RespondentFor Petitioner: Mr.R.Thamarai SelvanFor Respondent: Mr.C.BaskaranGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side)
O R D E RThis petition has been filed seeking to relax the condition 6(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9605 of 2025, dated 02.04.2025 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.ham2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.3. Considering the above submissions and the nature of offence, the condition 6(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9605 of 2025, dated 02.04.2025 is relaxed.4. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.25.06.2025hamTo1.The Inspector of Police, Kondalampatti Police Station, Salem City. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.M.P.No.11194 of 2025in Crl.O.P.No.9605 of 20252/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.