✦ Madras High Court

KUMARCrl.M.P. No. 6817 of 2026inCrl.O.P. No. 9620 of 20261. S. Kandasamy2. Ramesh v. State rep. byThe Inspector of Police

M NIRMAL KUMAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Crl.M.P. No. 6817 of 2026inCrl.O.P. No. 9620 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMARCrl.M.P. No. 6817 of 2026inCrl.O.P. No. 9620 of 20261. S. Kandasamy2. Ramesh..PetitionersVs.

1.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vellakoil Police Station, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. (Cr.No. 430 of 2025)

2.

Venkatesan..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners in all future hearing in C.C. NO. 676 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Kangayam, pending disposal of the above criminal original petition.1\2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P. No. 6817 of 2026inCrl.O.P. No. 9620 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR,J.nvFor Petitioners::Ms. Amala AnanthiFor Respondents::Mr.R. VinotharajaGovt. Advocate (Crl. Side)for R1

O R D E ROrdered.17.04.2026nv 3/3To1. The Principal District Judge Court, Tiruppur.2. The Judicial Magistrate, Kangayam.

3.

The Inspector of Police, Vellakoil Police Station, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

4.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.M.P. No. 6817 of 2026inCrl.O.P. No. 9620 of 20262\2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments