Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
22704 of 2025In the result, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2025, and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law within a…
Judgment
W.P.No.22704 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANW.P.No.22704 of 2025V.Asaithambi... Petitioner Vs.
The Secretary to the Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, Salem Division, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 636 007.... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2025, for assigning the petitioner to suitable alternative duties in considering of petitioner eye problem and grant such other relief. For Petitioner: Mr.T.PichappaFor Respondents: Mr.N.Naveenkumar Government Advocate for R1: Mr.K.Raja Standing Counsel for R2Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22704 of 2025ORDERThe instant writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.20252.The case of the petitioner is that, since he has been suffering from visual impairment, he has given representation to the second respondent dated 15.04.2025, seeking assignment of suitable alternate work and the said representation is yet to be considered. Hence the writ petition.
Learned Government Advocate as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would fairly submit that they would consider the petitioner's representation within a reasonable time.
Operative part
In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2025, and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22704 of 2025In the result, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.25.06.2025vedaIndex: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The Secretary to the Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, Salem Division, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 636 007. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22704 of 2025C.KUMARAPPAN, J.vedaW.P.No.22704 of 2025 25.06.2025Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 22704 of 2025In the result, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.