Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33.Joint Commissioner(ST), Intelligence-I, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in their proceedings in Form GST Mov-1 OR.No.17/2022-23 dated…
Judgment
W.P. No.30100 of 2022IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No.30100 of 2022M/s.Paramount Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. By its Director, No.163, Harinivas Tower,3rd Floor, Tambuchetty Street, Chennai-600 001. ... Petitioner Vs.
Deputy State Tax Officer, Intelligence-I, Commercial Taxes Building, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.
Adjudicating Authority, Intelligence-I, Joint Commissioner(ST), Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.
Operative part
Joint Commissioner(ST), Intelligence-I, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in their proceedings in Form GST Mov-1 OR.No.17/2022-23 dated 27.10.2022 and quash this goods detention proceedings and the levy of penalty as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred as GST Act) and also the integrated Goods and 1/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.30100 of 2022 Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred as IGST Act) and direct the 2nd respondent to release the imported goods which are under movement in this state under IGST Act. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Baktha SironmaniFor Respondents : Ms.Amrita Dinakaran Government AdvocateORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. 21.04.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nomka2/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.30100 of 2022To:1.Deputy State Tax Officer, Intelligence-I, Commercial Taxes Building, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.2.Adjudicating Authority, Intelligence-I, Joint Commissioner(ST), Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.3.Joint Commissioner(ST), Intelligence-I, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 3/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.30100 of 2022MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.mkaW.P. No.30100 of 202221.04.20254/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.