R.Rajendiran v. The Director
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act s. 205
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of that, the purpose of the writ petition does not survive now. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.31787 of 20234. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 10.01.2024 Index: Yes/NoNeutral…
Judgment
WP No.31787 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.01.2024CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHYWP No.31787 of 2023R.Rajendiran: Petitionerversus1.The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Branch Office, 293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai 162. The District Collector, Myladuthurai District 3. The Joint Director, Office of the Joint Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Mayiladuthurai4.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Vallalagaam, Mayiladuthurai5.The Block Development Officer, Village panchayats Kollidam, Sirkazhi6.A.Kanagaraj7.B.Sivaprakasam8.Thilagavathy: Respondents Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.31787 of 2023 Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 5 more particularly 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2023 and 27.04.2023 by conducting thorough enquiry on the alleged irregularities committed by respondents 6 to 8 by committing irregularities on the non-completion of cement road water pipelines and Rs.8,19,000/- was not credited in the account books at Aanaikkaranchatram panchayat, Kollidam, Sirkazhi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. For the Petitioner: Mr.P.AyyaswamyFor Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government PleaderORDER(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)We have heard Mr.P.Ayyaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader, for respondents 1 to 5.
The learned State Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that proceedings under Section 205 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act has been initiated against the sixth respondent/ president of the panchayat.
Operative part
In view of that, the purpose of the writ petition does not survive now. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.31787 of 20234. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 10.01.2024 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NotarTo1.The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Branch Office, 293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai 162. The District Collector, Myladuthurai District 3. The Joint Director, Office of the Joint Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Mayiladuthurai4.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Vallalagaam, Mayiladuthurai5.The Block Development Officer, Village panchayats Kollidam, SirkazhiPage 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.31787 of 2023THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.(tar) WP No.31787 of 202310.01.2024Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act — s. 205.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.