Rural Development Department v. State of Tamil Nadu
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
It is therefore clear that petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the matter and hence writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
WP.No.4357 of 2016IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 19.08.2024Coram:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALAWP.No.4357 of 2016andWMP.No.3718 of 2016 Rural Development Department, Pensioners Association Regn. No.73/2015,Rep. by its State President, Mr.A.Manivannan, No.3/145, South Street, Kambarasampettai, Trichy-620 101. ... PetitionerVs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. .. Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected in G.O.Ms. No.235, Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and quash Para 2(ii)(d) thereof in so far as it grant only 40% fitment weightage to retirees Page No. 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.4357 of 2016pension instead of 50% Grade Pay admissible to post retirees before 01.01.2006 and to consequently direct the respondent to fix the pension of the pre 01.01.2006 retirees on par with post 01.01.2006 retirees by allowing them revised pension at 50% of the Grade Pay in the light of the O.M.F No.38/37/08 P & PW(A) dated 28.01.2013 and to revise the pension of the petitioner and Pay the same along with arrears from 01.01.2006.For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondent : Mr.R.Kumaravel, Addl. Govt. PleaderORDERWhen the matter was listed on 07.08.2024, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, Registry was therefore directed to list the matter under caption 'for dismissal' today. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. It is therefore clear that petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the matter and hence writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected WMP is closed.19.08.2024dsnPage No. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.4357 of 2016ToThe Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.N.MALA, JPage No. 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.4357 of 2016 dsn W.P.No.4357 of 2016 19.08.2024Page No. 4 / 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: It is therefore clear that petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the matter and hence writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.