✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

N MALAWP

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Garments and fashions Wokers Union, Represented by its General Secretary, Elizabeth Rani.D/o. Late Savarimuthu51/5, Ground Floor, Yadaval Street, Kalakalchavadi, Chrompet, Chennai-600 047. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing…

Judgment

WP.No.11704 of 2019IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 18.01.2024Coram:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALAWP.No.11704 of 2019M/s. Celebrity Fashions Limited, Represented by its manager- HR, Mr.J.Jayachandran, Having Office at SDF IV & C2,3rd Main Road, MEPZ,Tambaram, Chennai- 600 045. ... PetitionerVs.

1.

The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) I,SIPCOT Office Complex, Irungattukkottai, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

Operative part

2.

Garments and fashions Wokers Union, Represented by its General Secretary, Elizabeth Rani.D/o. Late Savarimuthu51/5, Ground Floor, Yadaval Street, Kalakalchavadi, Chrompet, Chennai-600 047. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent herein to take up the I.D.No.23 of 2018 and dispose of the same expeditiously within Page No. 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.11704 of 2019a time frame to be fixed by this Court in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr. Bharath Kumar R.For Respondents : Mrs. Rajarajeswari, Government Advocatefor R1 R2- No appearanceORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.18.01.2024dsnIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoPage No. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.11704 of 2019ToThe Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) I,SIPCOT Office Complex, Irungattukkottai, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District. Page No. 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.11704 of 2019N.MALA,J dsn W.P.No.11704 of 2019 18.01.2024Page No. 4 / 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments