✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Case at a glance

Bench
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Outcome

Allowed

Upon examining the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Upon examining the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. The Registry is directed to consequently receive the written statement of the defendant.27-04-2026(1/2)KAL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1961 of…

Judgment

A No. 1961 of 2026__________Page1 of 3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYA No. 1961 of 2026inC.S.(Comm div) No.305 of 2025M/s.LEAP India LimitedRep by its Authorised Signatory,14th Floor, Commerz, International Business Park, Oberoi Garden City, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai, Maharaashtra, India-400063..Applicant(s)/DefendantVs1.M/s.Leaap International Private LimitedRep. By its DirectorMr.Subramaniam Krishnamurthy, Having its office at Old No. 6, New No. 11, Mayor Sathyamoorthy Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Chetpet, Chennai-600 031, Tamil Nadu...Respondent(s)/PlaintiffPRAYER: Judges summons under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S.Rules R/W. Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC praying to condone the delay of 45 days in filing the written statement. For Applicant(s):Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Senior Advocate, for M/s.Gaurav ChatterjeeFor Respondent(s): .Mr. Ramesh Ganapathy https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1961 of 2026__________Page2 of 3ORDERThe defendant has applied to condone the delay of 45 days in filing the written statement.

2.

In the affidavit in support, it is stated that detailed discussions had to be undertaken virtually between the applicant and its lawyers, who are based in two different cities.

3.

The respondent/plaintiff has no serious objection to this application being allowed.

Operative part

4.

Upon examining the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. The Registry is directed to consequently receive the written statement of the defendant.27-04-2026(1/2)KAL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1961 of 2026__________Page3 of 3SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.KALA No. 1961 of 2026inC.S.(Comm Div) No.305 of 202527-04-2026(1/2)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Upon examining the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 8 r. 1.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments