M.S.Rangarajan v. Vedamurthy
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.10.2012CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIAContempt Petition No.1496 of 2012M.S.Rangarajan .. PetitionervsVedamurthy .. RespondentContempt Petition filed under Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for wilful violation of the order of this Court dated 25.04.2012passed in CRP No.3123 of 2008.For petitioner : Mr.S.V.Vijay PrashanthFor respondent : Mr.T.S.Suresh ORDER Heard both sides.2. At the hearing, both sides Advocates in unison would state that the petitioner handed over the DemandDraft for Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees twelve lakhs only) to the respondent and the respondent in turn, handed over the key to the petitioner signifying handing over of vacant possession of the suit property and an affidavit of the petitioner also has been filed and it is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Recording the same, this contempt petition isclosed.vj2 SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS)//Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2012. COURT OFFICER (O.S.)From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in thisformat.KS(CO)05/11/2012One CC to Mr.S.V.Vijayprashanth, Advocate, SR.10163
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.