Akkammal Temple v. Mr.V.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,District Collector,Virudhunagar District,Virudhunagar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 2323. Since the order has already been complied with, thereis no scope for proceeding with the Contempt Petition. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(P&A)/True Copy/Sub-Assistant RegistrarToMr.V.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.+One CC to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.No.4204+One Cc to The Special Govt. Pleader, SR.No.4192rj2rl/4c…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 02.02.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARANContempt Petition (MD)No.21 of 2011inW.P.(MD)No.1918 of 2010 Akkammal Temple, Represented by its Trustee, Niraimathi Naicker,S/o.Angappa Naicker, Kallamanayakkanpatti, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Petitioner/PetitionerVs.Mr.V.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. ... Respondent/1st RespondentPRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court in W.P.(MD)No.1918 of 2010, dated 18.02.2010.WP(MD)No.1918/2010:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, praying for issuance fo a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 6.12.2008 to issue patta to the land situated in S.No.42/5and 38 of K.Paraipatti Village Group in the name of Arulmigu SriAkkammal Temple at K.Paraipatti, Sivakasi Taluk, VirudhunagarDistrict. For Petitioner : Mr.R.SubramanianFor Respondent : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Government AdvocateO R D E RThe petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents on account of his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court dated 18.02.2010 in W.P.(MD)No.1918 of 2010.2. When the Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has produced a copy of the proceedings dated 28.01.2011 passed by the first respondent in compliance of the direction issued by this court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Since the order has already been complied with, thereis no scope for proceeding with the Contempt Petition. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(P&A)/True Copy/Sub-Assistant RegistrarToMr.V.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.+One CC to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.No.4204+One Cc to The Special Govt. Pleader, SR.No.4192rj2rl/4c – 22.2.2011 Contempt Petition (MD)No.21 of 2011inW.P.(MD)No.1918 of 2010
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.