✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

P B BALAJI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed with the above direction

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CRP. PD. No.1696 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJICRP. PD. No. 1696 of 2025 Elango Petitioner(s) Vs1.Annappan2.Ekkmeraja3.Saroja4.Tmt. Saroja5.ThandapaniRespondent(s)PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned Principal District Munsif, Tiruvallur to dispose of the O.S. No.293 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tiruvallur within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Prabhu**********ORDER This petition is filed to direct the learned Principal District Munsif, Tiruvallur to dispose of the O.S. No.293 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tiruvallur within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. PD. No.1696 of 20252. Heard Mr.S.Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is seen from the records that the suit was filed way back in the year 2011 seeking relief of declaration and consequential injunction. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the suit is now in part heard stage (cross examination of P.W.1). Considering the suit is pending for over a decade, the Trial Court is directed to dispose the suit within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order without seeking any extension of time. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed with the above direction. No costs. 09.06.2025rkpIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NorkpNote: Issue order copy on 13.06.2025. To:The Principal District Munsif, Tiruvallur.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. PD. No.1696 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.,rkpCRP. PD. No .16 96 of 202509.06.20253/3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed with the above direction

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments