✦ Madras High Court

Lakshmi v. Arunagiri

S M SUBRAMANIAM

Case at a glance

Bench
S M SUBRAMANIAM

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above submission, no further adjudication is required in respect of the grounds raised in the appeal. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. 08.01.2021ssbIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking Order2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.S.A.No.7 of 2009S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ssbTo1. The 1st Additional District…

Judgment

C.M.S.A.No.7 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.01.2021CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMC.M.S.A.No.7 of 2009 Lakshmi ..Petitionervs. Arunagiri .. RespondentPRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 100 r/s Order XXLII Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C, against the judgment and decree dated 04.02.2009 in C.M.A.No.36 of 2007 on the file of the 1st Additional District Court, Coimbatore, reversing the fair and decreetal order dated 05.02.2007 in H.M.O.P.No.101 of 2000 on the file of the Sub-ordinate Court, Pollachi. For Petitioner : Mr.C.VeeraraghavanFor Respondent : Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan

O R D E RThe Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 04.02.2009 in C.M.A.No.36 of 2007 on the file of the 1st Additional District Court, Coimbatore, reversing the fair and 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.S.A.No.7 of 2009decreetal order dated 05.02.2007 in H.M.O.P.No.101 of 2000 on the file of the Sub-ordinate Court, Pollachi.

2.

Both the learned counsels, who are appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent through Video-conferencing, made a submission that the cause do not exist as the respondent died.

Operative part

3.

In view of the above submission, no further adjudication is required in respect of the grounds raised in the appeal. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. 08.01.2021ssbIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking Order2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.S.A.No.7 of 2009S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ssbTo1. The 1st Additional District Court, Coimbatore.2. The Sub-ordinate Court, Pollachi.C.M.S.A.No.7 of 200908.01.20213/3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXLII rr. 1, 2.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments