P.Rajangam v. Indian Overseas Bank,Mayiladuthurai Junction Branch
Case at a glance
- Bench
- P RAJAMANICKAM
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 15.12.2017 briIndex:yes/noInternet:yes http://www.judis.nic.in 3To1. The Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai.2. The Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai. http://www.judis.nic.in 4P. RAJAMANICKAM , J. bri S.A. No.1993 of 2000 15.12.2017
Judgment
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15.12.2017CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAMS.A. No.1993 of 2000andC.M.P.No.6300 of 2000P.Rajangam..AppellantVs.Indian Overseas Bank, Mayiladuthurai Junction Branch, Rep by its Manager and Power Agent R.Gopalan ..RespondentPrayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge of Mayiladuthurai dated 18.11.1999 passed in A.S.No.33 of 1999 allowing the appeal by reversing the decree and judgment of the Principal District Munsif of Mayiladuthurai dated 21.01.1999 passed in O.S.No.435 of 1997.For Appellant : No AppearanceFor Respondent: Mr.S.Vijayakumar ***** http://www.judis.nic.in 2J U D G M E N TIn the last hearing, i.e. on 11.12.2017, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter, today, under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Today, the matter has been listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. At the time of calling work, no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter has been passed over and taken up for hearing at 11.35 a.m, at that time also there is no representation for the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 15.12.2017 briIndex:yes/noInternet:yes http://www.judis.nic.in 3To1. The Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai.2. The Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai. http://www.judis.nic.in 4P. RAJAMANICKAM , J. bri S.A. No.1993 of 2000 15.12.2017
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.