P. KannaiyanS/o. PeriyanNo.5/27, Adidravidar Street,Olaipatty, O.Southapuram Post,Rasipuram v. M. Planisamy (deceased)1. Chinnammal
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R HEMALATHA
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Chinnammal, W/o. Late Palanisamy2. P. Gunasekaran, S/o. Late Palanisamy3. S. Latha D/o. Late Palanisamy ... RespondentsPRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 15.02.2017 in A.S.No.22 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, upholding…
Judgment
S.A.No.462 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHAS.A.No.462 of 2017P. KannaiyanS/o. PeriyanNo.5/27, Adidravidar Street, Olaipatty, O.Southapuram Post, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.... Appellant..Vs..M. Planisamy (deceased)
Operative part
Chinnammal, W/o. Late Palanisamy2. P. Gunasekaran, S/o. Late Palanisamy3. S. Latha D/o. Late Palanisamy ... RespondentsPRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 15.02.2017 in A.S.No.22 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, upholding the decree and judgment dated 17.02.2012 in O.S.No.164 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Rasipuram. For Appellant: No appearanceFor Respondents: No appearance1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.462 of 2017 R. HEMALATHA, J.bgaJUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, counsel on record for the appellant is not present. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.10.01.2025Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/NobgaTo1. The Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram.
The District Munsif , Rasipuram.
The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.S.A.No.462 of 20172/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.