✦ Madras High Court

Murugeshwari v. C.Anand

P B BALAJI

Case at a glance

Bench
P B BALAJI

Outcome

Dismissed

Recording the said submission, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Recording the said submission, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.03.06.2025Speaking/Non-speaking : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoataToThe Family Court, Tiruvallur.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.B. BALAJI,J.ataTr.C.M.P.No.44 of…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJITr.C.M.P.No.44 of 2024& CMP.No.1029 of 2024 Murugeshwari ... Petitionervs.C.Anand ... RespondentPRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw HMOP.No.259 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruvallur and to transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee. For Petitioner : M/s.A.ChitraORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have already settled the matter amicably and hence, nothing survives for further consideration in this petition.1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Operative part

2.

Recording the said submission, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.03.06.2025Speaking/Non-speaking : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoataToThe Family Court, Tiruvallur.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.B. BALAJI,J.ataTr.C.M.P.No.44 of 2024& CMP.No.1029 of 202403.06.20253/3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments