✦ Madras High Court

K.Narayana Das v. K.Balarama Das2.K.Bhagwan Das3.K.Rama Das4.Hotel Dasaprakash

P B BALAJI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for non prosecution

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11.K.Balarama Das2.K.Bhagwan Das3.K.Rama Das4.Hotel Dasaprakash, Rep. by its Managing Director K.Balarama Das5.T.P.Sankaran ...DefendantsPRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC r/w Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules, praying to pass judgment and decree against the defendant:-i) For partition and separate possession of…

Judgment

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.06.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJIC.S.No.115 of 1994K.Narayana Das ...Plaintiff Vs.

Operative part

1.

K.Balarama Das2.K.Bhagwan Das3.K.Rama Das4.Hotel Dasaprakash, Rep. by its Managing Director K.Balarama Das5.T.P.Sankaran ...DefendantsPRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC r/w Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules, praying to pass judgment and decree against the defendant:-i) For partition and separate possession of the suit properties morefully described in Schedule A & B hereunder into 4 shares by means and bounds and allot 3/10th share tot he plaintiff; ii) Appointing an Advocate Commissioner to effect such partition by metes and bounds; iii) Directing on enquiry into the mesne profits payable to the plaintiff andiv) Directing the defendants to pay the costs. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2For Plaintiff : No appearanceFor Defendants: No appearance- - - - -J U D G M E N TSince there was no representation on behalf of the plaintiff yesterday (26.06.2024), the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ''for dismissal'' today (27.06.2024). Even today, there is no representation on the side of the plaintiff. Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.27.06.2024ata https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3P.B.BALAJI, J. ataC.S.No.115 of 199427.06.2024

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for non prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. VII r. 1.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments