✦ Bombay High Court · 04 Mar 2026

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 11049 of 2025MADHAV JAMDAR PRAVIN S PATIL, PRAVIN S PATIL, MADHAV JAMDAR

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Mar 2026
Bench
MADHAV JAMDAR PRAVIN S PATIL, PRAVIN S PATIL, MADHAV JAMDAR

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as sought.

Judgment

Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan a/w Ajinkya Walekar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent - State. …………. CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR & PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 4th MARCH, 2026. P. C. :

1.

Mr. Suryajeet Chavan, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions of the Petitioner, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file a Civil Suit for appropriate reliefs.

Operative part

2.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as sought.

3.

It is clarified that this Court has not considered the matter on merits and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open. [PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. ] [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 1

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 04 Mar 2026. The bench was MADHAV JAMDAR PRAVIN S PATIL, PRAVIN S PATIL, MADHAV JAMDAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 11049 of 2025). ← Search more judgments