Raygonda Sattappa Patil since deceased through legal heirs 1.a Sulabai Raygonda Patil & Ors. v. Sadavarte
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Not on board. Taken on board. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17912 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.997 OF 2020 Sou. Ranjana Vasanth Raygandhi Versus Shri. Raygonda Sattappa Patil since deceased through legal heirs 1.a Sulabai Raygonda Patil & Ors. ...Applicant ...Respondents Mr. Manoj Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. S. V. Sadavarte, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sandeep Koregave, for Respondent No.3. CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 5th DECEMBER 2022 P.C. :
#2. Not on board. Taken on board. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
#3. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL 17:14:02 +0530
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.