Dushyant Vishwas Koli v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The Petition is allowed to be
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With these observations, the Petition is disposed of. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Satish Sangar 2 of 2
Judgment
Mr.Tejas Hilage – Advocate for Petitioner. Smt.M.M.Deshmukh – APP for Respondent No.1 – State. ***** CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 17th MARCH 2025 P.C. :
After arguing for some time and after inviting our attention to the F.I.R., when we expressed our disinclination to grant the reliefs in this Petition, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for unconditional withdrawal of this Petition, at this stage. He seeks liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, if and when the charge-sheet is filed.
Operative part
Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The Petitioner is at liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, if and when the charge- sheet is filed against the Petitioner. Satish Sangar 1 of 2 17-WP-1198-2025.odt
With these observations, the Petition is disposed of. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Satish Sangar 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Petition is allowed to be
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Mar 2025. The bench was S M MODAK, SARANG V KOTWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.