✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Mar 2022

Mr. Madhukar Baburao Jadhav & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Learned counsel for the applicants, on oral instructions from his clients, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Learned counsel further made a statement before the Court that a copy of communication from the applicants regarding withdrawal instructions would be placed on record within one…

Judgment

Mr. Madhukar Baburao Jadhav and ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ….Applicants ….Respondent Mr. Vishwajeet V. Mohite along with Mr. Shahuraj N. Patil, advocate for the applicants. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State. Mr. Shashank P. Borade i/b. Mr. Nagesh Chavan, advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 29th MARCH, 2022. P.C. :

#1. Learned counsel for the applicants, on oral instructions from his clients, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Learned counsel further made a statement before the Court that a copy of communication from the applicants regarding withdrawal instructions would be placed on record within one week from today. The said statement of the learned counsel for the applicants is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. Accordingly, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. ( S. M. MODAK, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 10:42:11 +0530

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 29 Mar 2022. The bench was S M MODAK, PRASANNA B VARALE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 169 of 2019). ← Search more judgments