Rane v. Asset Reconstruction Co. (India)
Judgment
Mr. Sai Kumar Pathrudu advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Smita R. Lad i/by M/s Apex Law Partners for respondent no.1. Ms. A.T. Jhaveri, APP for Staterespondent no.2. * * * * CORAM : CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. 2525thth FEBRUARY, 2013. FEBRUARY, 2013. P.C. : P.C. : 1). Ms. Lad, the learned counsel for respondent no.1 complains that copy of the writ petition has not been served upon respondent no.1. She also points out that the evidence in the trial has already commenced from this month and that the complainant has been partly crossexamined on behalf of the petitioners. Thereafter, the petitioners herein have not appeared before the trial court. Consequently, there is nonbailable warrant issued against petitioner Rane * 2/2 * WP4672012 Mon,25Feb,2013 no.2. The next date of the matter before the learned Magistrate is 8 th March 2013. In that circumstance, stand over to 12th March 2013, by way of an opportunity, petitioner no.2 to appear before the trial court on 8th March 2013. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.