M/S. AMERKAR CONSTRUCTION AND SONS v. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P. P. Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- S.A.BOBDE, J. Date:- 29th March, 2007 P.C. After hearing the matter for sometime, the following order is passed by consent.
(i) The respondent No.1 shall give opportunity of hearing to the appellant.
(ii) The appellant is directed to appear before the respondent No.1 on 30th April, 2007. In view of the above, the Civil Suit No.7/2006/II, pending in the Court of IInd Addl. District Judge, South Goa, Margao stands withdrawn. Pending decision on the application under Section 7-A(4) of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the respondent No.1 shall not proceed with the prosecution of the appeal. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. ssm. S.A.BOBDE, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 29 Mar 2007. The bench was S A BOBDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.