✦ Bombay High Court · 17 Dec 2004

Judgment · High Court · 2004

B H MARLAPALLE

Case at a glance

Order date
17 Dec 2004
Bench
B H MARLAPALLE

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO.5 OF 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. V. B. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. Y. V. Nadkarni, advocate for the appellants. Mr. S. G.Dessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mandar Shirodkar, advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 17th December, 2004. P.C.: Heard Mr. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dessai, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. The Chairman and Managing Director of the appellant Company is present in Court and so also officers of the respondent Company. The learned Senior Counsel for the respective parties on instructions, state that the negotiations undertaken by them have proved fruitful and resulted in an amicable settlement. Mr. Nadkarni therefore seeks leave to - 2 - withdraw the appeal. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. mc.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments