NURALLAH KAMRUDDIN VELJEE v. FARID VELJEE & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Consequently, the application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Application stands disposed of. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 17/06/2025 10:54:05 16th June 2025
Judgment
Judgment
#1. On going through this Court's order dated 23.05.2025 enlarging the applicant on bail, on terms stated in clauses (a) to (c) of paragraph 9, it is clariied that the order of bail was passed on the application for suspension of sentence and the appeal iled by the petitioner Mr Nurallah Kamruddin Veljee. It is further clariied that merely because the complainant Mr Farid Veljee has iled a separate Criminal Revision Application No.35/2024 against the very same order of the Sessions Judge dated
31.07.2024 seeking enhancement of the sentence, would not dis- entitle the applicant from release on the conditions speciied in this Court's order dated 23.05.2025. 16th June 2025 902-CRMA-56-2025.DOC
#2. Consequently, the application is allowed. he applicant shall be released on the terms speciied in this Court's order dated
23.05.2025 in Criminal Misc. Application No.491/2025 (F) on the terms stated therein without reference to the Criminal Revision Application No.40/2019 by the respondent as the release on bail is unconnected with that revision application. he applicant therefore shall not be kept in detention in respect of Criminal Revision Application No.40/2019 and shall be released in the same forthwith. Parties/Superintendent, Central Jail, Colvale to act immediately on an authenticated copy of this order being produced before him.
Application stands disposed of. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 17/06/2025 10:54:05 16th June 2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 16 Jun 2025. The bench was VALMIKI MENEZES.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.