✦ Bombay High Court · 16 Nov 2022

Bhupal Parisa Ainapure (Since Deceased), Through Legal Representatives v. Shivappa Annappa Berad & Anr.

Civil Application No. 642 of 2019VALMIKI MENEZES

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Civil Application is disposed of in the above terms

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned. Accordingly, I pass the following order :- (i) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). Petitioners to carry out necessary amendment to the cause-title…

Judgment

Mr. Rahul Kasbekar, i/by Mr. Surel S. Shah, for the Applicants-Petitioners. None for the Respondents. CORAM : VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2022. P.C. :

1.

This is an application for bringing legal representatives of deceased petitioner no.2 on record with a prayer for condonation of delay of 5 years, 1 month and 29 days in filing the application.

Operative part

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned. Accordingly, I pass the following order :-

(i) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). Petitioners to carry out necessary amendment to the cause-title of Writ Petition No.9029 SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT 12:06:18 +0530 Dixit of 2010, to add legal representatives of deceased petitioner no.2, whose names are listed in the cause- title of the application as respondent nos.2A to 2C, within a period of four weeks from today.

(ii) Civil Application is disposed of in the above terms. [ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] Dixit

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Civil Application is disposed of in the above terms

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 16 Nov 2022. The bench was VALMIKI MENEZES.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 642 of 2019). ← Search more judgments