✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Judgment

Mr. R. Kerkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. ...... Petitioner ...... Respondents Mr. S. Bandodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram :- S. J. VAZIFDAR U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date : 1 st April, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT Rule, by consent, made returnable and heard forthwith. Respondents waives service. Respondents state that the Petitioner's application dated 12.01.2009

#3. will be heard and disposed of on or before 15.04.2010. Whether it is Respondent no.1 or Respondent no.2 who is to hear the Petitioner's application, the Petitioner shall appear before Respondent no.2 in the first instance at 11.00 a.m. on

05.04.2010 and thereafter as directed by Respondent no.2 whether before Respondent no.1 or Respondent no.2. -2-

#4. All parties are directed to act upon an authenticated copy of this Order. arp/* S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 237 of 2010). ← Search more judgments