✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Jan 2010

M/s.Century Rayon v. Arvind Kumar Jagat Narayan Bajpai & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 37 of 2010S VAZIFDAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said consent

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.

Judgment

Mr.J.P. Cama, Senior Counsel with Mr.Rohan Cama and Ms.Neha M. i/b Ms.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Yogendra Rao Pendse with Mr.M.A. Shaikh for Respondent No.1.s CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :-

1.

The disputes and differences between the parties have been settled in terms of the consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates, tendered in Court, taken on record and marked “X”. The parties are present in Court.

Operative part

2.

The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said consent

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 Jan 2010. The bench was S VAZIFDAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 37 of 2010). ← Search more judgments