D) (SHALIGRAM KISAN CHANDURKAR & Anr. v. SONAJI MAHARAJ SHIKSHAN SANSTHA) & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The civil application stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.Z. NO.768/2011 IN L.P.A. NO.165/2010 IN W.P. NO. 3407/2009 (D) (SHALIGRAM KISAN CHANDURKAR & ANOTHER VERSUS SONAJI MAHARAJ SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.R. Deshpande, counsel for the applicant. Shri V.M. Deshpande, counsel for the appellents. Shri N.R. Saboo, counsel for the R-3 to 6. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND DATE : APRIL 18 PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. . , 2012 Heard. The civil application is misconceived and the prayer made therein cannot be granted. The Letters Patent Appeal No.165 of 2010 is already decided on 29.07.2010. In case, the applicant has any grievance against the not handing of the charge to the newly elected body, the applicant can move the appropriate authority under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The civil application stands dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE APTE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The civil application stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.