✦ Bombay High Court · 01 Sep 2010

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR v. The City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation

P DEVADHAR, A B CHAUDHARI

Case at a glance

Order date
01 Sep 2010
Bench
P DEVADHAR, A B CHAUDHARI

Outcome

Withdrawn

Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4755/2008 Prafulla son of Vinodji Gudadhe ...Versus... The City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation, through the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's order [Shri Padhye, Adv. h/f Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Adv. for petitioner] [Shri A.M. Ghare, Adv. for respdt. Nos.3 & 4] CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED :- 01.09.2010 The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the remedy under Section 407 of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948. Leave granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SSW

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 — s. 407.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 01 Sep 2010. The bench was P DEVADHAR, A B CHAUDHARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments