NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8497 of 2007 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 s. 289(1)
Judgment
Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 6, Mr. A.S. Kilor, Advocate for respondent nos.7 and 8, Mr. A.V. Bhide, Advocate for intervenor. .......... CORAM : DATED : K.J. ROHEE & R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. FEBRUARY 27, 2008.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The validity of the notices dated
15.9.2006 issued under Section 289(1) of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 as well as notice dated 27.9.2006 issued under Section 423 of the same Act is involved in the present writ petition. Respondent No.7 is the Co- 2 operative Society whereas Respondent no.8 is the Developer. They are not concerned with the status of the petitioners because the matter is between the Corporation and the Petitioners. The application moved by respondent nos. 7 and 8 is misconceived. The same is, therefore, dismissed. S.O. to 5.3.2008. JUDGE JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.