✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

M N GILANI

Case at a glance

Bench
M N GILANI

Judgment

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2304/2011 Rameshchandra F. Baheti ..vs.. Sandesh K. Randad and ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Mohta, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM DATED : S. A. BOBDE & M. N. GILANI, JJ. : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. We are not inclined to entertain this petition, since the petitioner can raise an objection regarding the jurisdiction of Consumer Forum to entertain a complaint before it. The Consumer Forum shall decide such an objection, if raised, in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date, the objection is raised. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. kahale JUDGE JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments