Writ Petition No. 141 of 2012 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 16 Jul 2012
- Bench
- SADHANA S JADHAV
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Bombay Police Act, 1951 s. 60
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.141 of 2012 [Ashutosh Pramod Awasthi .vs. State of Maharashtra and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.K. Bhangde, Advocate for Petitioner, Mr. S.B. Ahirkar, APP for Respondents. ----- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JULY 16, 2012. 1] 2] Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed challenging the externment order passed on 13.2.2012 against the petitioner. However, the petitioner has not availed of the statutory remedy contemplated under Section 60 of the Bombay Police Act,
Operative part
1951. This court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks protection for the time being to prefer an appeal. Two weeks’ time is granted. The appellate authority may condone the delay. The criminal writ petition is disposed of. GULANDE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Police Act, 1951 — s. 60.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 16 Jul 2012. The bench was SADHANA S JADHAV.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.