NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 791 /2009 (Suwarna Rajkumar Bhute v. Rajkumar Pandurang Bhute)
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 17 Jun 2009
- Bench
- VASANTI A NAIK
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19
Judgment
Operative part
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 791 /2009 (Suwarna Rajkumar Bhute VERSUS Rajkumar Pandurang Bhute) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Court's or Judge's orders Mrs. Rajashree Dewani, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P. Kariya, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 17, 2009. Shri Kariya, the learned counsel for the respondent, states that in view of the provisions of Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the petition would not be tenable and the impugned order dated 20.10.2008 could be challenged in an appeal before the Division Bench of this Court. Mrs. Rajashree Dewani, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. Permission and liberty, both, are granted as prayed for. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. APTE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Family Courts Act, 1984 — s. 19.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Jun 2009. The bench was VASANTI A NAIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.