NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Feb 2025
- Bench
- G GHAROTE, ABHAY MANTRI, AVINASH G GHAROTE
Outcome
Allowed
Hence, the civil application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. costs. List the petition on 03/03/2025. The civil application is disposed of. No order as to (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.155/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2386/2024 M/s Narayanlal Manna Lal Agrawal, Gondia, through its Partner Shri Vinod Kumar Narayanlal Agrawal ...Versus… State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary (Food), Food, Civil Supply & Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.S. Dabadghao, Advocate for petitioner/applicant Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 5 Mr. P.D. Meghe, Advocate for respondent No.4 Mr. S.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.7 Mr. O.A. Ghare, Advocate for respondent No.8 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 12/02/2025
The petitioner/applicant moved this application to permit him to amend the petition, as proposed in the application, for which learned Advocates for the other side have formally objected.
Having considered the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the petition has yet to be admitted, we deem it appropriate to allow the application.
Operative part
Hence, the civil application is allowed. The petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment within one week and supply a copy of the amended petition to the other 2
CAW 155 of 2025.odt side within one week thereafter.
After receipt of the amended petition, the respondents shall file their reply, if any, by the returnable date.
costs. List the petition on 03/03/2025. The civil application is disposed of. No order as to (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the civil application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 12 Feb 2025. The bench was G GHAROTE, ABHAY MANTRI, AVINASH G GHAROTE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.