✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Feb 2026

Judgment · High Court · 2026

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would…

Judgment

Judgment

#1. At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No. 7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

#2. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

#3. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

#4. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed at least one week before the next date.

#5. service. Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after

#6. Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

#7. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Vishal Parekar 1 of 2 Common Order-18.02.2026.odt Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 908 to 909 910 to 915 921 to 922 4 to 10 12 to 24 26 to 42 43 45 to 51 52 to 70 11/03/2026 Part Heard 24/03/2026 Fresh Admission 24/03/2026 Urgent Admission 26/03/2026 Fresh Admission 27/03/2026 Fresh Admission 30/03/2026 Fresh Admission 01/04/2026 Fresh Admission 02/04/2026 Urgent Admission 06/04/2026 Due Admission 71 to 100 07/04/2026 Due Admission 101 to 130 08/04/2026 Due Admission (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Vishal Parekar 2 of 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments