APPW No. 1 of 2024 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 09 Dec 2025
- Bench
- ANIL L PANSARE, RAJ D WAKODE
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In view of the order passed in Criminal Application No.3 of 2024, the application for grant of hearing opportunity through video conferencing does not survive. Hence, the same is disposed of. 913 APPW-1-2024.odt 2 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1 OF 2024
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1 OF 2024 [Satish Mahadeorao Uke and Another .vs. State of Maharashtra and Others] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Satish M. Uke, Petitioner in-person. Mr S. S. Doifode, AGP for Respondents/State. Mr R. S. Akbani, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATE : 09-12-2025. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO.1 OF 2024 .
Heard. For the reasons set out in the application, the application seeking dispensation of office objections is disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO.3 OF 2024
This is an application seeking permission to argue the matter in-person.
Since the petitioner has been now released from jail and is present before the Court, he is not pressing for any orders.
The application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO.2 OF 2024
In view of the order passed in Criminal Application No.3 of 2024, the application for grant of hearing opportunity through video conferencing does not survive. Hence, the same is disposed of. 913 APPW-1-2024.odt 2 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1 OF 2024
List in four weeks. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Tambe
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.