NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR v. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Arni, District Yavatmal & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Leave is granted to the applicants to amend the application. The amendment shall be carried out within two weeks, on filing of the charge sheet.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO.10 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.140 OF 2024 Madhukar Pandu Rathod and others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Arni, District Yavatmal and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A. V. Chirde, Advocate for applicants. Mr. N. B. Jawade, APP for non-applicant No.1/State. Mr. Viccky Gokhale, Advocate h/ Mr. R. J. Shinde, Advocate for non-applicant No.2. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 21/11/2025
By this application, the Investigating Officer is seeking permission to file the charge sheet. In view of the reasons mentioned the application, the permission is granted to file charge sheet.
The Criminal Application (APPP) No.10/2025 is disposed of.
Leave is granted to the applicants to amend the application. The amendment shall be carried out within two weeks, on filing of the charge sheet.
The amended copy of the application be placed on record and also supplied to the non-applicants. (2) 8.appp.10.2025
Matter be placed before this Court for further consideration on 20.01.2026. (NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J) Sarkate
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.