✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Writ Petition No. 1845 of 2026NANDESH S DESHPANDE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

In view of above, the petition is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of above, the petition is allowed. Therespondent No.2-Deputy Director of Education is herebydirected to take a decision in the matter of petitioner No.3 onthe proposal forwarded by the petitioner No.2-Headmasterwithin a period of four weeks for inclusion of his name in Shalarth…

Judgment

912-wp1845.26.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.WRIT PETITION NO. 1845 OF 2026 Gramin Yuvak Shikshan Sanstha, Takalghat and others-Vs.-The State of Maharashtra and others----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's Orders.or directions and Registrar's orders.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ms Anjali Agrawl, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.N.R.Patil, AGP the respondents-State.CORAM : SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR & NANDESH S.DESHPANDE, JJ.DATE : 27TH FEBRUARY, 2026P.C.Heard learned counsel Ms Anjali Agrawal for thepetitioners and learned AGP Mr.N.R.Patil for the respondentNos.1 to 3.

2.

The present petition is filed seeking direction tothe respondent No.2-Deputy Director of Education, Nagpurto take decision/grant approval for generating ShalarthID and for inclusion of name of petitioner No.3 in Shalarth list.

3.

From perusal of record, it appears that the respondentNo.3-Education Officer (Secondary) granted approval on26/02/2024 and also forwarded the proposal to therespondent No.2-Deputy Director of Education for approval of Shalarth ID. However, it is contention of the petitioners thatno decision is taken. In view thereof, petition can be disposedKHUNTE 912-wp1845.26.odt 2/2 of by directing the respondent No.2-Deputy Director of Education to take decision in the matter of petitioner No.3 onthe proposal forwarded by the Headmaster.

Operative part

4.

In view of above, the petition is allowed. Therespondent No.2-Deputy Director of Education is herebydirected to take a decision in the matter of petitioner No.3 onthe proposal forwarded by the petitioner No.2-Headmasterwithin a period of four weeks for inclusion of his name in Shalarth ID. The petition stands disposed of. No costs. (NANDESH S.DESHPANDE, J) (SMT.M.S.JAWALKAR, J)KHUNTE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1845 of 2026). ← Search more judgments